This may have also acted as a disincentive to individuals who wished to object to their data being collected and used. Requested additional personal information, including photos, when asked by members of the public if they were on Clearview’s database.Failed to meet the higher data protection standards required for biometric data, which constitutes sensitive/special category personal data and,.Failed to have a process in place to stop the data being retained indefinitely.Failed to have a lawful reason for collecting the personal data of individuals.Failed to use the information of individuals in the UK in a way that is fair and transparent, given that individuals are not made aware or would not reasonably have expected their personal data to have been used in this way.The ICO decided that Clearview had infringed UK data protection law because it had: As the Information Commissioner, John Edwards, also put it, Clearview “ not only enables identification of those people, but effectively monitors their behaviour and offers it as a commercial service is unacceptable.” Because of the high number of UK internet and social media users, Clearview’s database is, according to the ICO, likely to include a substantial amount of data from UK residents, which has been gathered without their knowledge.Īlthough (according to the ICO) Clearview no longer offers its services to UK organizations, Clearview has customers in other countries, so it is still using the personal data of UK residents. The affected individuals were however not informed that their images were being collected or used in this way. The app then provides a list of images that have similar characteristics with the photo provided by the customer, with a link to the websites from where those images came from.Īccording to the ICO, Clearview collected more than 20 billion images of people’s faces and data from publicly available information on the internet and social media platforms all over the world to create an online database. The case is yet another reminder of the conflicts between AI & GDPR.Ĭlearview provides a service that allows customers, including the police, to upload an image of a person to Clearview’s app, which is then checked for a match against all the images in Clearview’s database. Clearview collected images from the internet and from social media to create a global online database that could be used for facial recognition. (Clearview) £7,552,800 in May 2022 for data protection law infringements in using images of people for its AI product. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (the ICO) fined Clearview AI Inc. We first issued this alert on and have updated it to reflect more recent developments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |